Closed beta · access by invitation

The appeal the Court cannot dismiss without reading.

Spes Rex is a methodological assistant for assessing the viability of, and building, the federal extraordinary appeal before the Argentine Supreme Court —and the reply to it— without a single admissibility requirement going unnoticed.

What it is

Spes Rex verifies the admissibility requirements that decide the fate of the appeal before the merits are ever reached, structures the grounds of appeal, and subjects the appeal to a stress test against the typical causes of rejection —including the discretionary filter of section 280, Argentina's certiorari-style power to decline a case.

Admissibility first

Final judgment, highest court of the case, the time limit under section 257, timely reservation of the federal question, and a direct and immediate relationship: if one requirement fails, the merits are never read.

Structured grounds of appeal

It orders the federal question and each ground so that they are pleaded and supported separately, not merged into a narrative.

Rejection stress test

It subjects the appeal to the typical causes of rejection —section 280 included— before the Court does.

How it works

The method is designed with disciplines that protect the professional's judgement —they do not replace it.

Admissibility before the merits

It prioritises the requirements that decide the fate of the appeal. A brilliant ground does not save an inadmissible appeal.

It attacks every independent ground

It identifies the independent grounds on which the judgment rests; if one is left unrefuted, the appeal is deemed abandoned.

It flags every citation for verification

Every citation of case law or doctrine is flagged for verification against the official source. What has not been checked is not filed.

It does not invent case law

It does not assert a line of authority without a citable basis. It distinguishes what is supported from what must be confirmed.

The lawyer's judgement prevails

It orders, verifies and warns; the strategy and the signature belong to the professional.

For the professional

Designed for real work before the Court, not for the public.

Fewer appeals lost at the door

The admissibility check happens before filing, not at the Court.

Nothing in the judgment left unchallenged

The map of independent grounds prevents abandonment through a forgotten ground.

The submission, ordered for review

The grounds arrive structured and with the citations flagged, ready for your judgement.

We are in closed beta.

Access is by invitation while we complete the conditions for onboarding. If you already have your key, come in; if not, write to us.

Try the beta Request access